In the Interest of S.W.H.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.
After a bench trial on Appellees’ suit affecting the parent child relationship, the trial court appointed Appellees sole managing conservators and Appellant, the natural parent, as possessory conservator. In two points, Appellant argues the trial court erred in considering certain evidence of her actions during pregnancy and challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s decision to appoint Appellees as S.W.H.’s sole managing conservators. We reverse.
Factual and Procedural History
S.W.H. was bom on July 29, 1997.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Continental Coffee Products Co. v. CazarezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Leitch v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- A. S. and P. S. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2023
- Forty-One Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Dollars U.S. Currency ($41,630.00) v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- In Re SWHCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- In the Interest of I.S.P., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
- Jarmal Briscoe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.