Legal Opinion
Carie v. PSI Energy, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1999No. 83S01-9811-CV-695PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Harold Carie and AI Harper, employees of an independent contractor, each sued PSI Energy, Inc., for injuries sustained while performing maintenance on PSI’s equipment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of PSI. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that PSI might be liable under the “due precaution” exception. Carie v. PSI Energy, Inc., 694 N.E.2d 729 (Ind.Ct.App.1998). We now grant transfer and affirm the trial court.
Facts and Procedural Posture
The relevant facts in this case are undisputed. PSI’s Cayuga Generating Station produces electricity using…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ayres v. Indian Heights Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Logansport v. DickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Barnett v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Shambaugh & Son, Inc. v. CarlisleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.