Legal Opinion
Aragon v. Che Ku
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 28, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-3907 (WMW/KMM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge
In this dispute arising from the conditions of Plaintiffs’ employment, Defendants move to dismiss three counts of Plaintiffs’ four-count amended complaint for failure to- state a claim on which relief can be granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6);- (Dkt. 52;) For the reasons addressed below, the Court denies Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are twelve Latino individuals who are former or current employees bf Defendants. Defendants are five Minnesota corporations1 that operate grocery…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lesnik v. Eisenmann SEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Dietz v. Department of Social Services Child SupportDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
- Thanh Tam Nguyen and MDA LLC v. Clarence William Ramsey III; Shyrock MCA Holding, LLC; Calhoun Realty Company d/b/a Calhoun Companies; Manoj Moorjani; and Brent Joseph JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026