Legal Opinion

United States v. William Francis Kroll

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 27, 1969No. 16796PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STALEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, William Francis Kroll, was convicted by a jury of violating 50 U.S.C. App. § 462 by failing and neglecting to comply with an order of his local draft board to report for and submit to induction into the Armed Forces. It is from the district court’s denial of his motion' for a new trial that this appeal is taken. 1

The material facts can be briefly stated. Appellant was classified 1-A by his local board on April 20, 1964; no appeal was taken from this classification. On October 27, 1965, appellant’s local board mailed him a notice to report…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. David Arthur GeareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. SchoebelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  3. William McKinley Davis, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Richard William Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. United States v. John B. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Petition of William D. Scott v. Commanding Officer, Commander Thomas M. Volatile and Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. David B. StoppelmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. United States Ex Rel. Vaccarino v. Officer of DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. United States v. Phillip Michael KannerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API