Legal Opinion
United States v. Phillip Michael Kanner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1969No. 23391PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
The appellant was convicted in a trial without a jury of refusing to be inducted into the armed forces and sentenced to three years imprisonment. We affirm.
The case presents two questions:
1. Is a selective service registrant entitled, under the facts of this case, to have his classification as I-A reopened when he files his claim as a conscientious objector, after there is mailed to him a notice of induction? Involved in the question is whether this case is within Ehlert v. United States, in which a hearing in banc has been granted.
2. Was there a basis in fact…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Robert Nolen Briggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Clinton Roy Petrie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Sammy Salamy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- William McKinley Davis, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Steven Michael Oshatz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robert Cloyd Rusk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Alfred Loren WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Fred Lyman CralleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Magaro v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Bruce Allen UhlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.