Legal Opinion

Huizega v. Cutler & Savidge Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1883PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Ottawa. (Mills, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The plaintiff in this case, while in the employ of the defendant, was seriously injured by accidentally coming in contact with some of the machinery in the defendant’s saw-mill, when he was at work under the direction of the head sawyer in the mill. At the time the injury occurred he was, under the direction of the sawyer, removing a slab from some gearing that extended up through the floor two or three feet, and a portion of his pants caught in some cogs that were uncovered, and his leg was drawn thereby between the wheels and severely lacerated. From this injury he underwent great suffering…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Morris v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Kinney v. CrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Parkhurst v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Nadau v. White River Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ciriack v. Merchants' Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API