Legal Opinion

Ingols v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1954No. 1471PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant was charged by two informa-tions with selling sodium seconal, not then and there being a licensed pharmacist or employed by a licensed pharmacist of employed in a store licensed to sell 'certain drugs, medicines, etc. 1 One information charged a sale on March 26, 1953, at Ninth Street and New York Avenue. The other charged a sale on March 27, 1953, in the 900 block of Eighth Street. Appellant pleaded guilty to both charges and was sentenced on each charge to serve six months imprisonment and pay a fine of $200, such sentences to run consecutively. 2 After…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burke v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. State v. CotnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frank A. Tate v. United States of America, Robert M. Edelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Roosevelt F. Palmore v. Superior Court of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. Hines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Charles W. Taylor v. Paul F. Pegelow, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  5. Hines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API