Legal Opinion

Charles W. Taylor v. Paul F. Pegelow, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1964No. 9072PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

This habeas corpus proceeding seems to have been predestined to frustration and ultimate abortion. Innumerable difficult questions and an inordinate waste of time of judges and lawyers might have been avoided if Taylor had sought to present his question in a more appropriate forum. Such things might also have been avoided if the District Court had appointed counsel for Taylor at the hearing it granted on the petition for habeas corpus. They might still have been avoided if someone at the hearing had thought to ask Taylor whether or not he really was without counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ingols v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Donald A. Cates v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director, United States Medical Center for Federal PrisonersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Honore v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. William Joe Johnson v. Harry S. Avery, Commissioner of Correction, and C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  5. Craig v. HockerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API