Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Heywood

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1906No. S.F. No. 4515PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to set aside a probate homestead. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This was an application by Agnes Maud Heywood, the adopted daughter of deceased, for the setting aside to her of a probate homestead out of the separate property of deceased. The appellant was seventeen years and eleven months old at the time Franklin Heywood died, and at the time of her application was past the age of eighteen years. The court’s findings were such in other respects as to entitle her to the homestead, but finding also that at the time of the application she had attained and passed her majority, the application was denied. ■

The single question thus presented is whether a minor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Webb v. StillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re the Estate of BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Estate of BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McSwain v. CraycroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Estate of MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API