Legal Opinion
Dejay Stores, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 30, 1952No. 77, Docket 22391PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Affirming the decision of a Hearing Examiner, the Federal Trade -Commission on April 10, 1952, ordered the petitioner to cease and desist from using various devices to obtain addresses of delinquent debtors because such devices- had been found to be deceptive and misleading in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(a). The Hearing Examiner found that prior to 1943 the petitioner had sent delinquent debtors at their last known address a double post card reading: “Due to the shortage of transportation and manpower, we are unable to interview you personally. So please…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Rothschild v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Bennett v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. National Research Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Ai v. Frank Huff Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Giant Food Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Mayton v. Hiatt's Used Cars, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.