Legal Opinion

Bell Supply Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 27, 2016No. Slip Op. 16-41; Court No. 14-00066PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Kelly, Judge:

Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) remand redetermination filed pursuant to the court’s decision in Bell Supply Co. v. United States, 39 CIT -, 83 F.Supp.3d 1311 (2015) (“Bell”). Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, Nov. 9, 2015, ECF No. 88-1 (“Remand Results”). On February 7, 2014, Commerce issued a final scope ruling determining that green tubes manufactured in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”) used to process finished oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) in countries other…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  5. Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Bell Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API