Legal Opinion

Doubleday, Page & Co. v. Shumaker

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for an accounting. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Erlanger, J„

On January 22, 1904, plaintiff, a corporation, entered into an agreement with the defendant and one Hiddlebrook under which the defendant and said Hiddlebrook were to conduct a mail order department in plaintiff’s business; the capital required was to be furnished two-thirds by plaintiff and one-third by the others named. The profits or losses were to be divided in two equal parts, the plaintiff to share in one of such parts and the defendant and said Hiddlebrook in the other. Both the defendant and Hiddlebrook were to receive fixed salaries, and, in the event of either drawing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Woolsey v. . FunkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Vought v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. The Rider Life Raft Co. v. . RoachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Samson v. . FreedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brozan v. WormsNew York Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API