Samson v. . Freedman
New York Court of Appeals
The following is the opinion in this action: “ This action was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due upon an account stated. The answer to the complaint is substantially a general denial. “ There is not much dispute about the facts and they are substantially as follows: The plaintiffs were partners carrying on a business in England, and the defendant was a merchant doing business in the city of Eew York.
Read the full summary
The following is the opinion in this action: “ This action was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due upon an account stated. The answer to the complaint is substantially a general denial. “ There is not much dispute about the facts and they are substantially as follows: The plaintiffs were partners carrying on a business in England, and the defendant was a merchant doing business in the city of Eew York. At various times during the years 1880 and 1881 the plaintiffs and defendant had dealings with each other consisting of sales of merchandise by plaintiffs to defendant, on credit,…
1Opinion of the Court
Earl, J.,
reads for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute against"defendant on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment accordingly.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Dodson v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Krueger v. DodgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Ballard v. . BeveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Boyce v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Ract v. Duviard-DimeNew York Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.