Legal Opinion
Jarvis v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided August 6, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-383PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFRIN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Tim Jarvis brought this action against Defendants Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“Dean Witter”), Edward Sullivan and Peter R. Woodworth, alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), and the following state law claims: fraud, breach of contract, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. Defendants move to compel arbitration of all claims or, alternatively, to stay the proceedings of the federal claims.
This is the second time Defendants’ motion is before this court. In an earlier opinion issued in this case, Jarvis v. Dean Witter…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Finkle and Ross v. AG Becker Paribas, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Brener v. Becker Paribas Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- McMahon v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Shotto v. LaubDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.