Legal Opinion

Lahti v. Southwestern Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1930No. Docket No. 7499PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action to recover indemnity under a policy of automobile liability insurance.

The policy which was issued by defendant company in the sum of $5,000 covered a Chevrolet sedanette automobile of which one Margaret McMenamin was the owner and the assured named in the policy. Thereafter, and when the policy was in full force and effect, William McMenamin, her husband, while driving the automobile with the knowledge and consent of his wife, struck and injured the plaintiff, who brought suit against William McMenamin and recovered judgment in a sum in excess of $16,000. Margaret Mc-Menamin was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Ocean Accident Guarantee Corporation v. BearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Horn v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ChurchDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Crompton v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Canals González v. VidalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API