Legal Opinion

Evans v. Investors Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action on an insurance policy to recover expenses incurred, for surgery to correct a varicocele of plaintiff’s testicle. The case was tried before the court without a jury on a “Stipulated Statement of Facts,” with attached exhibits, including plaintiff’s deposition. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $1,389.15, plus costs and attorney fees. We affirm.

On August 10, 1972, defendant issued to plaintiff a health insurance policy which included the following “DEFINITION (S) ”:

“ ‘Sickness’ means sickness, illness or disease, contracted and causing loss…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schweigert v. Beneficial Standard Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Blalock v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Todd v. Occidental Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Smith v. Industrial Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Broccolo v. Horace Mann Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mogil v. California Physicians Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Provident American Insurance Co. v. CastañedaTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Provident American Insurance Co. v. CastañedaTexas Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API