Legal Opinion
Terracino v. Buzzi
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 22, 2010No. AC 30543PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The plaintiffs, Patricia Morasco, the administratrix of the estate of Jerome G. Terracino, 1 and Guardian Systems, Inc. (Guardian), appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted, in part, the motions for summary judgment filed by the defendants, Andrew J. Buzzi, Catherine Rossman and Robert Rossman, and after the plaintiffs withdrew their remaining claim. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly concluded that their claims were barred by collateral estoppel. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The relevant background facts are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Harp v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Southwick at Milford Condominium Ass'n v. 523 Wheelers Farm Road, Milford, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mexico Construction & Paving v. Thompson (In re Thompson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Barry v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF NEW BRITAINConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Errato v. SederDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Terracino v. Gordon and HillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Terracino v. Gordon and HillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010