King v. Tilden Park Estates
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of respondents. The motion for a nonsuit as to respondent Pringle-Hurd and Company, Inc., was granted at the conclusion of appellant’s opening statement on the ground that the terms of the agreement were not determined at the time the respondent agreed to pay the commission. The motion for a nonsuit as to respondents Gillett and Tilden Park Estates was granted at the close of appellant’s ease in chief on the ground that the alleged agreement violated the Statute of Frauds.
The amended complaint stated three alternative causes of action: the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Marks v. Walter G. McCarty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Allen v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Hearst Publishing Co. v. AbounaderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Keely v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.