Legal Opinion

In Re Arnovick

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2002No. 20010136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INTRODUCTION

HOWE, Justice:

1 Petitioners Kathleen G. Arnovick, Valerie L. Cox, and Henry B. Wansker appeal from the findings of fact and final determination of the executive committee of the Utah State Bar denying them admittance to the Bar.

BACKGROUND

12 Arnovick and Cox as "student applicants" and Wansker as an "attorney applicant" took the July 2000 Utah Bar Examination. Al three failed to pass. 1 The examination, as constructed, did not differ from other recent examinations; it contained 200 Multi-state Bar Examination multiple choice questions and 12 essay questions given over a two-day…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Eugene W. Tyler v. Trammell E. Vickery, Ralph Banks, Jr. v. Trammell E. Vickery, James E. C. Perry v. Edward S. Sell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re SchwenkeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McBride v. Utah State BarUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Arnovick v. Utah State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Long v. Utah State BarUtah Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API