Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Bliss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1944No. 30949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

Lee Bliss instituted an action in the district court of Tulsa county against City of Tulsa, Okla., a municipal corporation, for the purpose of recovering salary for a period of time during which he claims he was “an illegally discharged mechanic.” The jury’s verdict was for the city, but the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for new trial, and the city has appealed.

The order of the trial court granting the new trial does not contain any stated reason for granting the motion although there is incorporated in the record the remarks' of the court at the time he heard the motion and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. ThamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hays Trucking Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Acme Cab Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API