Legal Opinion
Acme Cab Co. v. Brown
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 13, 1945No. 31697PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., from an order of the trial court sustaining plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
The reason given by the trial judge for sustaining said motion is as follows:.
“. . . being fully advised in the premises finds that the plaintiff has not had a fair and impartial trial and that the verdict of the jury is erroneous and does not meet the approval of this court and that in order that justice may be done in the premises the verdict of the jury should be vacated. . . .”
The plaintiff sought to recover $10,250 damages for personal injuries…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Shreve v. CornellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. ThamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Little v. LovettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bennett v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967