Legal Opinion

Elan v. Tate

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 2018No. A161744PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

*77In this personal injury case, defendant appeals a judgment awarding plaintiff economic and noneconomic damages, contending that plaintiff's evidence was insufficient to show that plaintiff suffered permanent injury. Consequently, defendant contends, the trial court erred in instructing the jury on permanent injury and presenting the jury with information from mortality tables. We agree with defendant and, accordingly, reverse and remand.1

We summarize all the relevant evidence to evaluate "whether there was some evidence in the record from which the jury could have reached a verdict that was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hansen v. BussmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Feist v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Purdy v. Deere & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowden v. Genie Industries Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  2. James v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API