Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Bussman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1976PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for medical malpractice for failure to diagnose and treat a congenital condition known as hypothyroidism in a 10-month-old baby, with the result that her mental development was retarded. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict of $500,000 against defendant Bussman, who appeals from the resulting judgment. The jury also returned a verdict in favor of another doctor, who had been joined as a defendant, and a non-suit was granted to a third defendant.

Because of direct conflicts in the testimony it must be kept in mind that after a jury verdict in…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Senn v. BunickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Wolf Ex Rel. Wolf v. Nordstrom, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API