Legal Opinion

Phavixay v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 10, 2008No. CR 07-585PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul E. Danielson, Justice.

Appellant Chor J. Phavixay appeals from his conviction for delivery of methamphetamine, a violation of Ark. -Code Ann. § 5-64-401 (Repl. 2005), and his sentence to 384 months’ imprisonment. His sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred in admitting evidence of a prior crime, in violation of Rule 404(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Evidence. Alternatively, Phavixay submits that the evidence of the prior crime was inadmissible under Rule 403 of the Arkansas Rules of Evidence due to undue prejudice, waste of time, and confusion of the issues. Because we agree…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scroggins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Lamb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Diffee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Phavixay v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Jose Gonzales v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Hajek-McClure v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Markus Gentry v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API