Legal Opinion

Marshall Durbin & Co. v. Jasper Utilities Bd.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 15, 1983No. 80-859, 80-885, 81-139, 81-526 and 81-480PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

These consolidated appeals address the legal propriety of sewer, water, and gas rates imposed upon Marshall Durbin Co. (Durbin) by the Jasper Utilities Board (Board) for services provided since 1973. Durbin appeals from the trial court's order which 1) found all the rates and charges reasonable; 2) vacated all previously issued injunctions; and 3) granted summary judgment on the Board's counterclaim for $516,638.59 in unpaid charges.

Durbin contests, inter alia,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Carson v. City of PrichardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Sizemore v. OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASS'N, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Wyeth, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. Ex Parte Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Butler v. Audio/Video Affiliates, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API