Electrical Research Products, Inc. v. Home Amusement Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, District Judge.
In No. 4527 the plaintiff, a New York corporation, brings this action as a replevin action against the defendant, an Oklahoma corporation, alleging that it is the owner of, and entitled to the immediate possession of, certain goods, chattels, and mechanical devices, to wit, a certain electrical sound projector and reproducing equipment known as type 2—S equipment of the value of $6,600; that the plaintiff is the owner of said property, is entitled to immediate possession thereof, and that the defendant, although due demand has been made, refuses to deliver said property…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Anderson v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Electrical Products Corp. v. MoskoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.