Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Reed

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1928No. 18336PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The plaintiff in error commenced this action below against the defendants in error upon two causes of action: First, to recover a balance due on a promissory note executed by defendants; and, second, to recover on an indemnity contract executed by defendants and given the plaintiff as a part of the transaction, indemnifying plaintiff from loss.

The record discloses:

In March, 1922, the plaintiff was owner of certain stock in the First National Banla of Claremore which defendants desired to purchase for a consideration of $1,000. At that time the plaintiff and defendant Flippin (C.-M. 66) were…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. McBlair v. GibbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Bowerman v. HamnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Dobry Flour Mills, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Ball v. Wilshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. Shepard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Schmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Balderacchi v. RuthCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API