Legal Opinion
Eddy v. Louis M. Hickman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1933No. Docket No. 4978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem .
Plaintiff brought this action for commissions as real estate agent, for his services in selling three tracts of land owned by defendant.
He recovered judgment for his commissions, and from this judgment defendant has appealed. It is alleged in the complaint that on September 10, 1926, three separate contracts were entered into between appellant, by and through its secretary, and the Westfall Land Company for the sale of three separate tracts owned by appellant. That each of these contracts stated that certain lands therein described had been sold to a purchaser for a sum…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Buskirk v. KuhnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- McNulty v. New Richmond Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Mitchell v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Byrne v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kline v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1953
- Gordon Bldg. Corp. v. Gibraltar Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Kline v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953