Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth B. Kush

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1978No. 77-5284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is yet another appeal in which the attorney for the appellant has failed to file an appendix as required by Rule 30, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 1 The Government appeals from the order of the district court granting defendants’ motion to suppress certain evidence. We dismiss the appeal for failure to file an acceptable appendix.

On November 21,1977, this court entered the following order in this action:

Defendant-Appellee Kenneth B. Kush has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that appellants have filed an appendix without complying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leonard A. Morrison v. Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. Jared Powers GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  3. Salem M. Alnajjar v. Ford Motor Company and Ernest R. BreechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  5. Columbus Wood Preserving Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Craig ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. Sharon Hartleip, Cross-Appellee v. McNeilab Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. ReddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Liberty State Bank & Trust, (91-2122) v. Metro Passbook, Inc. David A. Kersh, (89-2030) and Danica Kersh Alan GildenbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API