United States v. Redd
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARR, District Judge.
Defendants Arnold Redd and Bernard Shackleford, former Detroit police officers, appeal their convictions, and Shackleford appeals his sentence, in this case involving civil rights violations. Shackleford argues that the district court committed prejudicial error by denying his pre-trial motion for severance, and that the court committed legal error in sentencing him based on a total combined offense level of 24. Redd argues that he should be granted a new trial due to the publication, during jury deliberation, of an “inherently prejudicial newspaper article, and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shackleford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002