Legal Opinion
United States v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1975No. 75-1130PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad has moved to dismiss the appeal for failure on the part of the United States of America to comply with Rule 30, F.R. A.P., requiring the appellant to prepare and file an appendix to its brief.
The brief filed by the government purports to include an appendix, but the appendix fails to meet the minimum requirements of Rule 30(a). Although Rule 30(a) states that the appellant’s appendix “shall’ contain “(1) the relevant docket entries . . . ; (2) any relevant portions of the pleadings, charge, findings or opinion; (3) the judgment, order or decision in question; and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Secatore's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- Fmc Corporation, Inc. v. Knowles Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kunen v. First Agricultural National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Benoit Brookens v. Dawn WhiteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- F D L Foods, Inc. v. Kokesch Trucking, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- United States v. Scott Memorial HospiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Kenneth B. KushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978