Legal Opinion

Dr. Kelly Isbell v. Jeanne Russell, Mission Street Consulting LLC, and Kate Rogers

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 6, 2022No. 13-20-00193-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-20-00193-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG DR. KELLY ISBELL, Appellant, v. JEANNE RUSSELL, MISSION STREET CONSULTING LLC, AND KATE ROGERS, Appellees. On appeal from the 166th District Court of Bexar County, Texas. DISSENTING MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Silva Dissenting Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva I disagree with the majority that Isbell’s pleadings conformed with the agreed order granting appellee’s special exceptions. I would conclude that the trial court’s decision was correct.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Baylor University v. SonnichsenTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Paramount Pipe & Supply Co. v. MuhrTexas Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API