Ex parte First United Security Bank and Paty Holdings, LLC.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MURDOCK, Justice.
This Court granted certiorari review to clarify our decision in First Union National Bank of Florida v. Lee County Commission, 75 So.3d 105 (Ala.2011), and to further address who is the “owner” entitled to recover excess funds received from the tax sale of real estate. We reverse and remand.
I. Facts and Procedural History
First United Security Bank (“First United”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Paty Holdings, LLC (sometimes hereinafter referred to collectively as “the bank”), brought suit to- recover excess funds received by Tuscaloosa County from the tax sale of real…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loventhal v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Taylor v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Boone v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Whitehurst v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- First Union Natl. Bank v. Lee Cty. Comm., 1090804 (Ala. 6-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Nat'l Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- First United Security Bank v. McCollumCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015