Legal Opinion

Whitehurst v. Baker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 20, 2006No. 1050871 and 1050964PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Paul Whitehurst ("the GAL") was appointed guardian ad litem for Joseph William Field, the minor child of Elizabeth Rowland Baker, deceased. The GAL unsuccessfully contested the decedent's will. He then claimed attorney fees and costs for acting as guardian ad litem, and the trial court ordered the estate to pay the GAL's fees and costs. Wilburn Michael Baker, the executor of the decedent's estate ("Baker"), petitioned the court for authority to satisfy the award to the GAL by the sale of certain specific assets of the estate. The trial court granted the petition. Because the assets to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. T.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Taylor v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Hart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Bradley v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boone v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. ARCHER EX REL. ARCHER v. Estate of ArcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Ex Parte Quality Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. ALABAMA DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Noland Health Services, Inc. v. State Health Planning & Development AgencySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API