Legal Opinion

Selox, Inc. v. Ford

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1984PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

Plaintiff, Selox, Inc., brought this action against Lucky J. Ford, its former employee, to enjoin Ford from continuing his employment with Proweld, Inc., a Chattanooga business concern which competes to some extent with the plaintiff. Selox alleged that Ford’s continued employment with Proweld was in violation of a non-competition covenant which he had made during his employment with the plaintiff. The case was heard orally before the Chancellor upon an application for a temporary restraining order and the Chancellor concluded that a restraining order should be denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allright Auto Parks, Inc. v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hasty v. Rent-A-Driver, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kaset v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Vantage Technology, LLC v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Heyer-Jordan & Associates, Inc. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. Hogan v. Coyne International Enterprises Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics East, Inc. v. William C. KitchensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  5. Dabora, Inc. v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API