Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Rosen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 14, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.
This dispute arises from plaintiffs’ discovery of defects in the residential property that plaintiffs purchased from defendant. On September 3, 2005, plaintiffs received defendant’s Property Condition Disclosure Statement (hereinafter PCDS) pursuant to Real Property Law article 14 and the parties executed a purchase and sale agreement. As relevant to this appeal, the PCDS gave notice of defendant’s actual knowledge of a kerosene leak on the property, and denied actual knowledge of any rodent infestation or damage, any basement seepage resulting in standing water, or any material defect in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kerusa Co. v. W10Z/515 Real Estate Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bethka v. JensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Stoian v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Boyle v. McGlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Bishop v. GrazianoNew York District Court · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klafehn v. MorrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Sample v. YokelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- SICIGNANO, III, HENRY v. DIXEY, LARAMIE N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Devine v. MeiliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Acheson v. PellicciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.