Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Graziano

New York District Court

Decided October 18, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Stephen Hackeling, J.

*343The plaintiff buyer brings this action sounding in breach of contract and fraud seeking to recover for patent damage to the floors and walls which were discovered upon taking occupancy of a house she purchased. The defendant sellers assert Real Property Law § 465 (1) and/or the common law as an affirmative defense which bars all claims for property damage after the tender of a deed in an “as is” sale of real property.

Factual Background

It is undisputed that on July 2, 2004 the parties executed a New York State Bar Association (NYSBA) approved…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Chase Manhattan Bank v. PerlaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Stambovsky v. AckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Moser v. SpizzirroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernardi v. SpyratosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Meyers v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API