Legal Opinion
State v. Bishop
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 1992No. 12836PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Chief Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal by defendant of the district court’s order denying his motion in limine to exclude the results of certain breath tests administered to defendant. The sole issue raised by this case is whether the district court erred in refusing to give collateral estoppel effect to the findings made in a previous license revocation appeal to district court. We affirm.
FACTS
Defendant was involved in an automobile accident resulting in the deaths of four people and the injury of three others. After the accident, breath tests were administered to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon, Takura Fujiwara, and Melinda Isabel FujiwaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Ysasi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Maso v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dellaira v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.