State ex rel. Coleman v. City of Leavenworth
Supreme Court of Kansas
Originai proceeding in quo warranto.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
This is an original proceeding in quo warranto, brought by the state on the relation of the attorney-general against the city of Leavenworth to oust it from the exercise of assumed and unwarranted corporate powers and privileges. The petition contains two counts, in one of which it is alleged that for two years last past the city has abused its corporate powers by imposing and collecting license taxes upon the business of selling, and keeping for sale, intoxicating liquors to be used as a beverage. It is alleged that during the period…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Nesbit v. Riverside Independent DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Guilford v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State ex rel. Little v. Regents of the University of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Dewey v. St. Albans Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- Schrader v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016