Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 2016No. 113528Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 113,528 STATE OF KANSAS ex rel. DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Quo warranto is an appropriate means of attacking the validity of a municipal ordinance. 2. An appellate court may properly entertain an action in quo warranto if it decides the issues raised are of sufficient public concern. 3. Appellate courts generally avoid making unnecessary constitutional decisions. Thus, where there is a valid alternative ground for relief, an appellate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Elkins v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API