In Re Klemann
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The controlling questions in this case are whether the books, records and documents are rele vant and material and whether the casualty report constitutes a privileged communication.
Directing, first, our attention to the question of privileged communications; the law exacts disclosure of the truth in all proceedings except to the extent that non-disclosure is protected by constitutional provision or statutory enactment.
The philosophy behind exemption from disclosure of privileged communications is well stated in Anderson v. Bank of British Columbia, (1876) Chancery, L. R. 2 Ch. D., 644, 649.…
2Cited by45 opinions
- Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- The People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CochraneOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Peyko v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Bloom-Carroll Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.