Legal Opinion

In Re Klemann

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1936No. 26034, 26035 and 26036PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The controlling questions in this case are whether the books, records and documents are rele vant and material and whether the casualty report constitutes a privileged communication.

Directing, first, our attention to the question of privileged communications; the law exacts disclosure of the truth in all proceedings except to the extent that non-disclosure is protected by constitutional provision or statutory enactment.

The philosophy behind exemption from disclosure of privileged communications is well stated in Anderson v. Bank of British Columbia, (1876) Chancery, L. R. 2 Ch. D., 644, 649.…

2Cited by45 opinions

  1. Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. The People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CochraneOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Peyko v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Bloom-Carroll Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2011

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API