Legal Opinion

Damien Demarquis Huckaby v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided May 29, 2003No. 02-01-00301-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-01-301-CR

DAMIEN DEMARQUIS HUCKABY APPELLANT

V

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

OPINION

------------

I. Introduction

Appellant Damien Demarquis Huckaby appeals his conviction for aggravated kidnapping. In seven points, he alleges that (1) the statements of an alleged co-conspirator were admitted in violation of the rules of evidence and the right to confrontation; (2) the trial court erred by allowing a witness to testify that Huckaby requested an attorney; (3) the trial court erred…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API