Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Atlantic National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 23, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort brought by the plaintiff, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of Sarah L. Tenney, against the defendant, a banking corporation, to recover an amount equivalent to the proceeds of a certain check for $13,251.80. All the material evidence appears in the bill of exceptions. “At the conclusion of the evidence, the court allowed a motion by the defendant for a directed verdict in its favor and directed such a verdict; and stated to the jury that the evidence disclosed nothing which ■ was legally negligent in what the defendant had done.” The plaintiff duly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Allen v. Puritan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Kendall v. Fidelity Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Batchelder v. Central National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Proctor v. NorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Briggs v. Merchants National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Banks v. Everett National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Boston Note Brokerage Co. v. Pilgrim Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Columbia Land Co. v. EmpsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API