Boston Note Brokerage Co. v. Pilgrim Trust Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This is an action of “tort or contract” to recover damages from the defendant banking corporation because of its conduct with respect to a check payable to the plaintiff corporation. The facts appear in statements of counsel, which they agreed were to constitute a statement of agreed facts submitted as evidence, but not a case stated. Scaccia v. Boston Elevated Railway, 317 Mass. 245, 249. King Features Syndicate, Inc. v. Cape Cod Broadcasting Co. Inc. 317 Mass. 652.
One Leventhal, a depositor in the defendant bank, lent $10,000 to the plaintiff corporation upon its note, dated August 20,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Allen v. Puritan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Empire Trust Co. v. CahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Go-Best Assets Ltd. v. Citizens BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Elbar Realty, Inc. v. City Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Schlichte v. Granite Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Go-Best Assets Ltd. v. Citizens BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Jermyn v. Worcester Bus Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.