Legal Opinion
Harrington v. Board of Adjustment
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 9, 1939No. 4958PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOKES, Justice.
On the 14th of September, 1928, the City of Alamo Heights, an independent suburb of San Antonio, by proper ordinance of its city council, enacted a comprehensive zoning plan under Chapter 283 of the Acts of the Fortieth Legislature, Arts. 1011a to lOllj, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, whereby the entire city was divided into zones or districts. Five small business districts were established and the balance of the city extending to the corporate limits was designated as district No. 10 and made exclusively a residence district. It was provided that no business building…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Abie State Bank v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Matter of Levy v. Bd. of Standards AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Josephson v. AutreySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- MODDY v. City of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Swain v. Board of Adjustment of City of Univ. ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- West Texas Water Refiners, Inc. v. S & B Beverage Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.