Legal Opinion
People v. Dawkins
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 1, 1987No. 3650PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
195 Cal.App.3d 1 (1987)
241 Cal. Rptr. 456
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
DANIEL DAWKINS, Defendant and Respondent.
Docket No. 3650.
Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Francisco.
May 1, 1987.
COUNSEL
Arlo Smith, District Attorney, and George Butterworth, Assistant District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Stuart Hanlon and Tamburello, Hanlon & Bresciani for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
WILLIAMSON, J.
The People appeal from the order of the court below dismissing charges against respondent on the grounds that the district attorney is precluded from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Gimbel v. LaramieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Gilroy v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- McAlister v. Essex Property TrustDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007