Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Baker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1986No. 01889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

In a non-jury trial, defendant was convicted of burglary, conspiracy, and criminal trespass. The trial court denied defendant’s post-verdict motions and imposed a sentence of two to ten years imprisonment for burglary (defendant received a suspended sentence on the conspiracy charge). Defendant failed either to petition the court to reconsider his sentence or to take a direct appeal. He subsequently filed a pro se petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA), which was later amended by new counsel and denied by the PCHA court after a hearing. In this appeal defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Glen Smith, Elton Rieara, Elvis Smith and Roland GeorgesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Daywalt v. Montgomery HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. McMillanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. NicodemusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API