Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McMillan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1988No. 3219PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

The Commonwealth appeals from an order granting reconsideration of post-verdict motions and awarding a new trial, some two years, eight months, and nine days after the original order denying post-verdict motions was entered. We reverse and remand for re-sentencing.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts and the procedural history of this storied case may be summarized as follows. At approximately 9:30 p.m. on November 10,1982, appellee/defendant, Dynel McMillan, accosted the victim in front of Phyllis’s Bar in Philadelphia *29and demanded repayment of a five dollar debt allegedly owed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Larry Gene Hull v. Kenneth Kyler, Superintendent Pa Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. ShankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. NicodemusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API