Commonwealth v. McMillan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
The Commonwealth appeals from an order granting reconsideration of post-verdict motions and awarding a new trial, some two years, eight months, and nine days after the original order denying post-verdict motions was entered. We reverse and remand for re-sentencing.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts and the procedural history of this storied case may be summarized as follows. At approximately 9:30 p.m. on November 10,1982, appellee/defendant, Dynel McMillan, accosted the victim in front of Phyllis’s Bar in Philadelphia *29and demanded repayment of a five dollar debt allegedly owed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Larry Gene Hull v. Kenneth Kyler, Superintendent Pa Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. ShankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. NicodemusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.