Legal Opinion

In Re Prb Docket No. 2002.093

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 5, 2005No. 03-519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. We review, sua sponte, a Professional Responsibility Board Hearing Panel decision that respondent attorney placed a misleading advertisement of professional services, in violation of Rule 7.1 of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct, and should be privately admonished as a consequence. We affirm the hearing panel’s finding and penalty recommendation.

¶ 2. The facts, as stipulated by the parties and found by the hearing panel, may be briefly summarized. Respondent placed an advertisement in the Yellow Pages describing his law firm — in large capital letters placed at the top of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FurthOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Mississippi Bar v. ATTORNEY RMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. Spurr Self Storage Unit Construction ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API