Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2001No. 00-2341PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

On February 1,1999, relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, filed a two-count complaint charging respondent, Thomas Craig Furth of Chagrin Falls, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0033870, with violating numerous Disciplinary Rules. On September 9, 1999, relator filed an amended, eleven-count complaint alleging additional Disciplinary Rule violations. Respondent answered through counsel and thereafter stipulated to a number of facts and exhibits. The matter was heard by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”).

Counts 1 through 5 concern…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Integration of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. NienaberOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. GrieselhuberOhio Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. HardimanOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. PowersOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. DavieOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. FondaOhio Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API